Acusa-sub-sub-sub-sub-sub-sub-sub-sub-sub-sub-sub-sub-sub-sub-sub-sub-sub-sub-sub-sub-sub-sub-sub-sub-sub-sub-sub- sub-sub-sub-sub-sub-sub-sub-sub-sub-sub-sub-sub-sub-sub-sub-sub-sub-sub-sub-sub-sub- Mujer es Más

¿El cerebro de Hard Ran del cambio cerebral del Shivam Dube es reemplazar un temblor? Los críticos y los fanáticos fueron cancelados.

Harshit Rana and Shivam Dube were the two players who powered India to victory in the 4th T20I match against England, which saw India win their 17th T20I series at home. Interestingly, Rana made his debut in the match as a concussion substitute for Shivam Dube. Fans are criticizing the BCCI and the umpires for the substitution, arguing that it was not a like-for-like replacement but rather more of an impact player for India.

Fans call it unfair as Harshit Rana was not Like-to-like replacement for Dube

The concussion substitute rule states that the player replacing the concussed player should be a like-for-like replacement. In India’s case, Shivam Dube is a batter who can bowl, while Harshit Rana is a bowling all-rounder. Therefore, fans are slamming the umpire and BCCI for misusing the rule.

More than a Concussion Sub, Harshit Rana qualified as an Impact player; and we all know impact players aren’t allowed in T20 internationals.
India won. But it all didn’t really add up honestly #INDvsENG

— Vikrant Gupta (@vikrantgupta73) January 31, 2025

How can an out & out bowler replace a batter who bowls part time !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! #INDvsENG

— Michael Vaughan (@MichaelVaughan) January 31, 2025

While I would be happy to rake a win as Indian…

It’s a Blatant Che#ting to replace a Batting Allrounder who rarely bowls with a Proper bowler who can bat

ICC isn’t serious about Impact Player, BCCI still having it literally#INDvENG pic.twitter.com/5EMGzAShPg

— Abhijeet ♞ (@TheYorkerBall) January 31, 2025