A rigorous nine-year research review looking at the relationship between fluoride and intelligence in children concludes that as fluoride levels rise, IQ drops.Every 1 part per million increase in fluoride in urine – a way of measuring all the sources of fluoride a person consumes – was associated with a roughly 1 point drop in a child’s IQ score, the review concluded.While an impact like that may seem small for any one person, on a wider scale, the study authors note, the consequences are significant, especially for those who are vulnerable because of risk factors like poverty and nutrition.”A 5-point decrease in a population’s IQ would nearly double the number of people classified as intellectually disabled,” they write in their conclusions.The study, which was published Monday in the journal JAMA Pediatrics, comes with a backstory. It was conducted by scientists at the government’s National Toxicology Program, a program that evaluates chemicals and other things people are exposed to, like cell phone radiation, for their potential to harm health. It began in 2015, and was subjected to several rounds of reviews, in a process that some critics charge was designed to delay its public release. The full review was finally published as a lengthy monograph in August, and in September, the study became the basis of a federal judge’s ruling ordering the US Environmental Protection Agency to further regulate fluoride to protect children’s intellectual development.”Simply put, the risk to health at exposure levels in United States drinking water is sufficiently high to trigger regulatory response by the EPA” under federal law, US District Judge Edward Chen wrote in the ruling.In November, Robert F. Kennedy Jr., President-elect Donald Trump’s pick for US Health and Human Services secretary, made headlines after he called fluoride “an industrial waste” and pledged that the Trump administration would advise utilities to stop adding to public water supplies.Fluoride is a naturally occurring mineral that’s found in soil, rocks and water to varying degrees. On the recommendation of the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and the World Health Organization, many cities have added fluoride to their treated drinking water for decades to protect teeth from cavities.As it washes over teeth, fluoride can stop early decay by putting minerals back into tooth enamel. It also makes teeth more resistant to acid and interferes with bacteria’s ability erode teeth.That same year, the CDC reiterated its faith in the health benefits of fluoride, naming water fluoridation one of the “10 Greatest Public Health Achievements of the 21st Century.”Now, though, environmental health experts say health agencies need to reassess the risks and benefits of fluoride because of its potential neurotoxicity.In some places, including areas that have well water that’s naturally high in fluoride, children were getting so much fluoride that it left streaks and spots on their teeth, a condition called dental fluorosis. In 2015, HHS lowered its recommended levels for fluoride in drinking water from a range of 0.7 parts per million to 1.2 parts per million to 0.7 parts per million to prevent fluorosis.”The evidence is sufficient. It’s not definitive,” says Dr. Bruce Lanphear, an epidemiologist and professor at Simon Fraser University in Canada. Lanphear wrote a commentary on the new paper, and one of his studies was included in the review but was not involved in the report’s conclusions.”We need to pause. We need to review the evidence,” Lanphear said, “Rather than just stick their head in the sand.”In a separate commentary on the study, Dr. Steven Levy, a professor of preventive and community dentistry at the University of Iowa, questions the conclusions of the research and the way JAMA Pediatrics is presenting them, since the study itself doesn’t talk about the rounds of reviews and the delay in its public release.Levy says just publishing the meta-analysis of human studies doesn’t give readers important context about animal studies conducted by the National Toxicology Program, which found no apparent decrease in learning and memory in rodents exposed to low to moderate fluoride levels. He points out that all of the human studies included in the review were from countries outside the U.S., and the majority are classified by the study authors as having a high risk of bias.”Thus, despite the presentation of some evidence of a possible association between IQ and high fluoride levels in water, there is no evidence of an adverse effect at the lower fluoride levels commonly used in CWF systems,” he wrote.The study authors agree with him on that point.In a written statement emailed to CNN, they say they didn’t have enough data to know if the level of fluoride that’s recommended for drinking water has any impact on children’s IQ.Study findingsThe new review includes 74 studies from 10 countries. Most of the studies, 45, come from China, where researchers first noticed differences in intelligence between communities exposed to high fluoride levels and those that did not.Researchers then picked apart the methods of each study, looking at factors like the age of the children who were involved, how they were tested for intelligence, and how researchers measured their exposure to fluoride, whether they estimated it from less exact metrics like amount of fluoride in the water where they lived, or whether it came from more precise measures such as lab testing fluoride in urine.Some of the strongest studies, from Canada and Mexico, looked at measures of fluoride in the urine of pregnant women, and then tested the IQ of their children years later.The researchers then sliced the data in three different meta-analyses, or studies of studies.In their first study, which included nearly 21,000 children from 59 studies, they found significant differences in IQ between children with the highest and lowest fluoride exposures. Looking at all the data, children exposed to the highest fluoride levels scored about 7 points lower on IQ tests compared with those exposed to the lowest fluoride. When researchers restricted their analysis to only the highest quality studies, the difference remained, though it was not as large, about 3 IQ points.In a second analysis of studies with group-level measurements of fluoride in urine and water, the researchers found a slightly more than 2-point drop in IQ between the highest and lowest fluoride levels. When researchers restricted their analysis to the 4 studies with the lowest risk of bias in their data, they found that children drinking water with 2 parts per million of fluoride had IQ scores that were almost 5 points lower, on average, compared to those who weren’t exposed to lower levels. When researchers looked at water below 1.5 parts per million, however, there were no significant differences in IQ.In a group of four studies with a low risk of bias that reported group-level measures of fluoride in urine, they found people with less than 1.5 parts per million in their urine–a measure of all the sources they consume, not just water, found their IQ scores were about 1 point lower, on average than those exposed to lower levels.In a final meta-analysis of studies that reported individual measures of fluoride in urine and IQ scores in nearly 4500 children, they found a 1 part per million increase in fluoride was linked to a 1.63 drop in IQ score.Lanphear says the consistency of the findings is striking across all these analyses.”Children who had higher fluoride exposure, whether that was measured with fluorosis, which is kind of a crude measure, or fluoride in water, or fluoride in urine, they found consistent evidence that higher exposure was associated with diminished IQ,” he said.
A rigorous nine-year research review looking at the relationship between fluoride and intelligence in children concludes that as fluoride levels rise, IQ drops.
Every 1 part per million increase in fluoride in urine – a way of measuring all the sources of fluoride a person consumes – was associated with a roughly 1 point drop in a child’s IQ score, the review concluded.
While an impact like that may seem small for any one person, on a wider scale, the study authors note, the consequences are significant, especially for those who are vulnerable because of risk factors like poverty and nutrition.
“A 5-point decrease in a population’s IQ would nearly double the number of people classified as intellectually disabled,” they write in their conclusions.
The study, which was published Monday in the journal JAMA Pediatrics, comes with a backstory. It was conducted by scientists at the government’s National Toxicology Program, a program that evaluates chemicals and other things people are exposed to, like cell phone radiation, for their potential to harm health. It began in 2015, and was subjected to several rounds of reviews, in a process that some critics charge was designed to delay its public release. The full review was finally published as a lengthy monograph in August, and in September, the study became the basis of a federal judge’s ruling ordering the US Environmental Protection Agency to further regulate fluoride to protect children’s intellectual development.
“Simply put, the risk to health at exposure levels in United States drinking water is sufficiently high to trigger regulatory response by the EPA” under federal law, US District Judge Edward Chen wrote in the ruling.
In November, Robert F. Kennedy Jr., President-elect Donald Trump’s pick for US Health and Human Services secretary, made headlines after he called fluoride “an industrial waste” and pledged that the Trump administration would advise utilities to stop adding to public water supplies.
Fluoride is a naturally occurring mineral that’s found in soil, rocks and water to varying degrees. On the recommendation of the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and the World Health Organization, many cities have added fluoride to their treated drinking water for decades to protect teeth from cavities.
As it washes over teeth, fluoride can stop early decay by putting minerals back into tooth enamel. It also makes teeth more resistant to acid and interferes with bacteria’s ability erode teeth.
That same year, the CDC reiterated its faith in the health benefits of fluoride, naming water fluoridation one of the “10 Greatest Public Health Achievements of the 21st Century.”
Now, though, environmental health experts say health agencies need to reassess the risks and benefits of fluoride because of its potential neurotoxicity.
In some places, including areas that have well water that’s naturally high in fluoride, children were getting so much fluoride that it left streaks and spots on their teeth, a condition called dental fluorosis. In 2015, HHS lowered its recommended levels for fluoride in drinking water from a range of 0.7 parts per million to 1.2 parts per million to 0.7 parts per million to prevent fluorosis.
“The evidence is sufficient. It’s not definitive,” says Dr. Bruce Lanphear, an epidemiologist and professor at Simon Fraser University in Canada. Lanphear wrote a commentary on the new paper, and one of his studies was included in the review but was not involved in the report’s conclusions.
“We need to pause. We need to review the evidence,” Lanphear said, “Rather than just stick their head in the sand.”
In a separate commentary on the study, Dr. Steven Levy, a professor of preventive and community dentistry at the University of Iowa, questions the conclusions of the research and the way JAMA Pediatrics is presenting them, since the study itself doesn’t talk about the rounds of reviews and the delay in its public release.
Levy says just publishing the meta-analysis of human studies doesn’t give readers important context about animal studies conducted by the National Toxicology Program, which found no apparent decrease in learning and memory in rodents exposed to low to moderate fluoride levels. He points out that all of the human studies included in the review were from countries outside the U.S., and the majority are classified by the study authors as having a high risk of bias.
“Thus, despite the presentation of some evidence of a possible association between IQ and high fluoride levels in water, there is no evidence of an adverse effect at the lower fluoride levels commonly used in CWF [community water fluoridation] systems,” he wrote.
The study authors agree with him on that point.
In a written statement emailed to CNN, they say they didn’t have enough data to know if the level of fluoride that’s recommended for drinking water has any impact on children’s IQ.
Study findings
The new review includes 74 studies from 10 countries. Most of the studies, 45, come from China, where researchers first noticed differences in intelligence between communities exposed to high fluoride levels and those that did not.
Researchers then picked apart the methods of each study, looking at factors like the age of the children who were involved, how they were tested for intelligence, and how researchers measured their exposure to fluoride, whether they estimated it from less exact metrics like amount of fluoride in the water where they lived, or whether it came from more precise measures such as lab testing fluoride in urine.
Some of the strongest studies, from Canada and Mexico, looked at measures of fluoride in the urine of pregnant women, and then tested the IQ of their children years later.
The researchers then sliced the data in three different meta-analyses, or studies of studies.
In their first study, which included nearly 21,000 children from 59 studies, they found significant differences in IQ between children with the highest and lowest fluoride exposures. Looking at all the data, children exposed to the highest fluoride levels scored about 7 points lower on IQ tests compared with those exposed to the lowest fluoride. When researchers restricted their analysis to only the highest quality studies, the difference remained, though it was not as large, about 3 IQ points.
In a second analysis of studies with group-level measurements of fluoride in urine and water, the researchers found a slightly more than 2-point drop in IQ between the highest and lowest fluoride levels. When researchers restricted their analysis to the 4 studies with the lowest risk of bias in their data, they found that children drinking water with 2 parts per million of fluoride had IQ scores that were almost 5 points lower, on average, compared to those who weren’t exposed to lower levels. When researchers looked at water below 1.5 parts per million, however, there were no significant differences in IQ.
In a group of four studies with a low risk of bias that reported group-level measures of fluoride in urine, they found people with less than 1.5 parts per million in their urine–a measure of all the sources they consume, not just water, found their IQ scores were about 1 point lower, on average than those exposed to lower levels.
In a final meta-analysis of studies that reported individual measures of fluoride in urine and IQ scores in nearly 4500 children, they found a 1 part per million increase in fluoride was linked to a 1.63 drop in IQ score.
Lanphear says the consistency of the findings is striking across all these analyses.
“Children who had higher fluoride exposure, whether that was measured with fluorosis, which is kind of a crude measure, or fluoride in water, or fluoride in urine, they found consistent evidence that higher exposure was associated with diminished IQ,” he said.
