Minneapolis agrees to federal police reforms after George Floyd’s death
Good morning. Everyone here with me today. Our Associate Attorney General, Vanita Gupta, assistant Attorney General for civil rights Kristen Clark and first Assistant United States Attorney Anne Bilson. I also want to acknowledge Mayor Jacob Fry, council, President Andrea Jenkins community safety commissioner, Cedric Alexandra Alexander and police chief Brian o’hara. Thank you all for joining us today on May 25 2020 George Floyd was killed at the hands of *** law enforcement officer who was sworn to protect him as Mr Floyd died, other officers failed to intervene. The justice department has since convicted four former Minneapolis police officers for their roles in the death of George Floyd. As I told George Floyd’s family this morning, his death has had an irrevocable impact on the Minneapolis community and our country and I’m the world, his loss is still felt deeply by those who loved and knew him and by many who did not. George Floyd should be alive today. Shortly after I was sworn in as attorney general, I announced that the justice department had opened *** separate civil investigation into whether the Minneapolis Police Department, the MP D and the city of Minneapolis engaged in *** pattern or practice of unconstitutional or unlawful policing. I am here today to announce the findings of that investigation. I am also announcing that the justice department, the city of Minneapolis and the N P D have agreed in principle to negotiate towards *** consent decree. Since opening the investigation, the justice department has engaged in *** comprehensive review of MP DS policies, training, supervision and use of force investigations. Our review focused on MP D as *** whole, not on the actions of any individual officer. We observed many MP D officers who did their difficult work with professionalism, courage and respect, but the patterns and practices we observed made what happened to George Floyd possible. As one city leader told us, quote, these systemic issues didn’t just occur on May 25th, 2020. There were instances like that that were being reported by the community long before that the Department of Justice has concluded that there is reasonable cause to believe that the Minneapolis Police Department and the city of Minneapolis engaged in *** pattern or practice of conduct that violates the 1st and 4th amendments of the United States Constitution. There is also reasonable cause to believe that they engage in conduct that violates title six of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 the Safe Streets Act and the Americans with Disabilities Act. Specifically, we found that MP D in the city of Minneapolis engages in *** pattern or practice of using excessive force unlawfully discriminating against black and native American people in enforcement activities, violating the rights of people engaged in protected speech and discriminating against people with behavioral disabilities and responding to them when responding to them in crisis. I will discuss each finding in somewhat greater detail. First, we found that the Minneapolis Police Department routinely uses excessive force often when no force is necessary including unjust deadly force and unreasonable use of tasers. MP D officers discharge firearms at people without assessing whether the person presents any threat, let alone *** threat that would justify deadly force. For example, in 2017, an MP D officer shot and killed an unarmed woman who he said had quote, spooked him when she approached his squad car. The woman had called 9 11, 911, sorry to report *** possible sexual assault in *** nearby alley. We also found that MP D officers routinely disregard the safety of people in their custody. *** review found numerous incidents in which MP D officers responded to *** person’s statement that they could not breathe with *** version of you can breathe, you’re talking right now. We also found that MP D officers failed to intervene to prevent unreasonable use of force by other officers. Indeed, as outlined in our report years before he killed George Floyd Derek Shovin used excessive force on other occasions in which multiple MP D officers stood by and did not stop him. Second, we found that MP D unlawfully discriminates against Black and native American people in its enforcement activities including the use of force following stops. Based on our review of the data. MP D officers stop search and then use force against people who are black and native American at disproportionate rates. The data showed for example, that MP D stopped black and native American people nearly six times more often than white people in situations that did not result in arrest or citation, given their shares of the population. We found several incidents in which MP D officers were not held accountable for racist conduct until there was *** public outcry. For example, after MP D officers stopped *** car carrying four Somali American teens, one officer told the teens, do you remember what happened in Black Hawk down when we killed *** bunch of your folk? I’m proud of that. We didn’t finish the job over there if we had, you guys wouldn’t be over here right now. As every everyone, no doubt knows, this is *** reference to the 19 nineties raid by American Special Forces in Mogadishu. Such conduct is deeply disturbing and it erodes the community’s trust in law enforcement. We found that NPD violates the rights of people engaged in protected speech, including by retaliating against protesters as well as members of the press, for example, on May 30th, 2020 MP D officers and counter journalists who were sheltering at *** gas station. One officer approached *** journalist who was filming while holding up his press credential and shouting, I’m press. The officer forcefully put, forcefully pushed the journalist’s head to the pavement. And when the officer and when the journalist held up his press credential again, an MP D sergeant pepper sprayed him in the face and walked away. Fourth. We found that MP D along with the city discriminates against people with behavioral health disabilities. When responding to calls for assistance. Assistant Attorney General Clark will discuss these findings in further detail to the credit of N P D and city leaders. Some important changes have already been instituted. Those include prohibiting all types of neck restraints and banning no knock search warrants. But as the report outlines, there is more work to be done. The Justice Department is recommending 28 remedial measures that provide *** starting framework to improve public safety, build community trust and comply with the constitution and federal law. As I noted at the outset in an important step toward reform, the city of Minneapolis and MP D have signed an agreement in principle with the Department of Justice. This agreement commits the city and MP D to work with the Justice Department, the community police officers and other stakeholders to address the problems that we have identified. And this agreement commits all parties to the negotiation to negotiate *** legally binding consent decree with an independent monitor. We are grateful to city and MP D leaders for their shared commitment to addressing these deep seated challenges. I also want to take this opportunity to address the officers of the Minneapolis Police Department. Your profession is essential. The work you do on *** daily basis is extremely difficult and often very dangerous. Your responsibilities are enormous and could not be more important. You are asked to keep your community safe, to uphold the rule of law and to ensure equal justice under law for you to succeed. Your police department must provide you with clear policies and consistent training that explain and reinforce constitutional boundaries and responsibilities. It must give you the support, you need to do your jobs safely and effectively and its supervisors and chain of command must enable you to achieve the highest professional standards. This agreement is an important step forward to providing you with the support and resources. You need to do your job effectively and lawfully and finally to the people of Minneapolis. Thank you for your partnership throughout our review process. During the investigation, the justice department met with many community members in including people who had had encounters with police, religious leaders, advocates and many others who want *** police department that serves them better. We also met with the families of people who died or suffered grave injuries during encounters with MP D officers. Thank you for sharing your experiences with us. We could not have completed this investigation without your contributions. Please continue to engage in these issues in the months ahead. Your involvement is critical to our success and finally to the career staff of the civil rights division of the United States Department of Justice and the US Attorney’s Office for the District of Columbia who conducted this investigation. Thank you for your work, which will make Minneapolis *** better place for all of its residents. Today, we have completed our investigation, but this is only the first step we look forward to working with the city and P D to achieve meaningful and durable reform.
The Minneapolis City Council on Monday approved an agreement with the federal government in response to the murder of George Floyd that would require reforms within the city’s police department under long-term court supervision.The agreement, known as a consent decree, has been under negotiation since the Department of Justice issued a scathing critique of the city’s police in June 2023. The report alleged that police systematically discriminated against racial minorities, violated constitutional rights and disregarded the safety of people in custody for years before Floyd, a Black man, was killed by a white Minneapolis officer in 2020. Floyd’s death prompted a national reckoning with police brutality and racism.The Justice Department report was the result of a sweeping two-year investigation that confirmed many citizen complaints about police conduct. The investigation found that Minneapolis officers used excessive force, including “unjustified deadly force,” and violated the rights of people engaged in constitutionally protected speech.An independent monitor will oversee the changes and a judge must approve them.During his first administration, President-elect Donald Trump was critical of consent decrees as anti-police. Finalizing the Minneapolis agreement before he returns to office Jan. 20 would make it harder for him to undercut the deal, because changes would require court approval.The council approved the deal 12-0 Monday during a brief public vote that followed an hourslong closed-door discussion.A state court judge in 2023 approved a similar agreement between Minneapolis and the Minnesota Department of Human Rights after the state agency issued its own blistering report in 2022. The state investigation found that the city’s police had engaged in a pattern of race discrimination for at least a decade.The Justice Department has opened 12 similar investigations of state and local law enforcement agencies since April 2021, many in response to high-profile deaths at the hands of police.It has reached agreements with Seattle, New Orleans, Baltimore, Chicago and Ferguson, Missouri. A consent decree with Louisville, Kentucky, after an investigation prompted by the fatal police shooting of Breonna Taylor is waiting court approval. In Memphis, Tennessee, the mayor last month pushed back against pressure for a consent decree there, saying his city has made hundreds of positive changes since the beating death of Tyre Nichols.Consent decrees require law enforcement to meet specific goals before federal oversight is removed, a process that often takes years and millions of dollars. A major reason Minneapolis hired Brian O’Hara as police chief in 2022 was his experience implementing a consent decree in Newark, New Jersey.If the Minneapolis federal agreement gets court approval, the city would be in the unusual position of operating under both federal and state consent decrees.
The Minneapolis City Council on Monday approved an agreement with the federal government in response to the murder of George Floyd that would require reforms within the city’s police department under long-term court supervision.
The agreement, known as a consent decree, has been under negotiation since the Department of Justice issued a scathing critique of the city’s police in June 2023. The report alleged that police systematically discriminated against racial minorities, violated constitutional rights and disregarded the safety of people in custody for years before Floyd, a Black man, was killed by a white Minneapolis officer in 2020. Floyd’s death prompted a national reckoning with police brutality and racism.
The Justice Department report was the result of a sweeping two-year investigation that confirmed many citizen complaints about police conduct. The investigation found that Minneapolis officers used excessive force, including “unjustified deadly force,” and violated the rights of people engaged in constitutionally protected speech.
An independent monitor will oversee the changes and a judge must approve them.
During his first administration, President-elect Donald Trump was critical of consent decrees as anti-police. Finalizing the Minneapolis agreement before he returns to office Jan. 20 would make it harder for him to undercut the deal, because changes would require court approval.
The council approved the deal 12-0 Monday during a brief public vote that followed an hourslong closed-door discussion.
A state court judge in 2023 approved a similar agreement between Minneapolis and the Minnesota Department of Human Rights after the state agency issued its own blistering report in 2022. The state investigation found that the city’s police had engaged in a pattern of race discrimination for at least a decade.
The Justice Department has opened 12 similar investigations of state and local law enforcement agencies since April 2021, many in response to high-profile deaths at the hands of police.
It has reached agreements with Seattle, New Orleans, Baltimore, Chicago and Ferguson, Missouri. A consent decree with Louisville, Kentucky, after an investigation prompted by the fatal police shooting of Breonna Taylor is waiting court approval. In Memphis, Tennessee, the mayor last month pushed back against pressure for a consent decree there, saying his city has made hundreds of positive changes since the beating death of Tyre Nichols.
Consent decrees require law enforcement to meet specific goals before federal oversight is removed, a process that often takes years and millions of dollars. A major reason Minneapolis hired Brian O’Hara as police chief in 2022 was his experience implementing a consent decree in Newark, New Jersey.
If the Minneapolis federal agreement gets court approval, the city would be in the unusual position of operating under both federal and state consent decrees.